Visit us on Stand B38!
We are delighted to have secured stand B38 at the BIBA Conference & Exhibition 2018, taking place on the 16th & 17th May at Manchester Central.
As well as a great opportunity to showcase our range of legal expenses and assistance products, it’s the perfect time to catch up, over an ARAG coffee, with new and familiar faces.
Over the two days, our sales team and senior managers will be on hand to discuss how our flexible and innovative solutions can work for you and your customers. However, with over six months to go until the big event, if you would like get in touch with us before then please email enquiries@arag.co.uk.
Click here to register for the event.
Follow us on Twitter @ARAG_UK and keep updated with all our #BIBA2018 news!
Welcome to ARAG UK's Blog where we provide news and discussion on the issues facing the legal expenses market.
Tuesday, 10 October 2017
Monday, 11 September 2017
Further discount applied
Last week’s
announcement of a new process for setting the discount rate applied to serious
injury compensation did not come as quite the surprise that the sudden hike in
March did, and the proposals seem targeted on the middle ground between
insurers and those representing severely injured accident victims. ARAG’s
Product Development Manager Lesley Attu takes a closer look at the
announcement.
Liz Truss sent
the insurance industry into a tailspin a little over six months ago, when she
announced a change to the ‘discount rate” from 2.5% to -0.75%. Share prices
dropped, premiums were hiked and the insurers’ PR machines went into somewhat
unseemly overdrive, demanding that the ‘crazy’ decision to ensure that people
with catastrophic injuries should be adequately compensated, be urgently
reviewed.
It may not have
come about quite as quickly as some would have liked, but the MoJ’s proposals
for a new mechanism to set the discount rate seem designed to strike a
compromise. If Lord Chancellor David Liddington’s prediction that the new
system would currently generate a rate between 0% and 1%, then it could fall
very close to the mid-point between the -0.75% that so outraged the ABI and the
2.5% that it lobbied and fought so hard and for so long to preserve.
The MoJ says it
will maintain a 100% compensation rule so that claimants should receive full
compensation for the loss caused by the wrongful injury, and not any more, nor
any less. It has accepted that the existing legislation governing how the rate
is set is unrealistic and could result in awards that significantly
overcompensate claimants.
The consequence,
it claims, is that the NHS and other public sector bodies can be adversely
affected and insurance premiums are inflated.
The MoJ has also
acknowledged that injury victims are likely to be more risk averse than
ordinary, prudent investors but that “low risk” rather than “very low risk”
investments would represent a fairer benchmark.
Primary
legislation is necessary and, once it is passed, the discount rate will be set
by the Lord Chancellor, who will take advice from a panel of independent
experts. The panel will be chaired by the Government Actuary and will include
four other members who will bring experience as an actuary, an investment
manager, an economist and a consumer investments expert. HM Treasury will
continue to be a statutory consultee for each review, which will take place
every three years.
The panel will
still be able to set different rates for different types of case, but the
principles behind how the rate is set will be set out in the legislation.
So far, the Lord
Chancellor’s news has been received more enthusiastically by the insurance
industry (and its investors) than those representing injured victims, but only
time will tell if the new rate setting mechanism will prove fairer or not.
Friday, 8 September 2017
More cases are going to court
The Ministry of Justice has today published its Q2 civil justice statistics for England and Wales: http://bit.ly/2vOexrj
Between April to June 2017, increases can be seen across most stages of county court activity (claims, defences, trials and judgments made).
• County court claims volumes are up by 40% compared to the same quarter 2016, driven by specified money claims (for example contractual disputes and debts).
• In April to June 2017, the highest quarterly number of County Court claims were lodged since 2009, at 565,000. Of these, 457,000 were specified money claims (up 54% on April to June 2016).
• Increases have also been seen in non-money claims for the second consecutive quarter. For example, returns of goods claims have increased by 53% since Q3 2015.
• Claims were more likely to be defended than previously. For claims that had gone to trial in April to June 2017 the figures show a 10% increase in the number of defended cases.
• The average time taken from claim to hearing has increased.
Our view
The above figures corroborate the ever-increasing value of legal expenses protection and on- line legal services. ARAG policyholders can easily access online legal services to chase for outstanding debts and letters are available to download to help businesses, landlords and consumers to resolve a whole range of disputes.
Where, despite chasing for money that is owed, payment cannot be obtained; where the sum in dispute is high or where there is a dispute over goods and services our customers are insured against costs to proceed to litigation.
Wednesday, 6 September 2017
ARAG Legal Services - www.araglegal.co.uk
ARAG Legal Services provides access to hundreds of reactive legal documents, forms and letters that customers can easily build on line together with a law guide.
Depending on which ARAG product they have bought the customer will have access to business, consumer or landlord content on the site. For example, businesses can download a free employment handbook and employment documentation; consumers can download a free will and landlords can download a tenancy agreement and documents to serve notice of possession. The site gives clear guidance and prompts.
I have been looking at what respondents to our Customer Feedback survey told us about their experience of using our legal services website. Access to the website is available to most of our before-the event legal expenses insurance (LEI) policyholders. It can be useful as a retention tool by providing value to customers who would not otherwise make a claim against their ARAG policy.
Here’s a snapshot of some of the survey results which covered 1 January to the end of July this year:- 80% of respondents rated the ease of using the website as excellent or very good.
- 89% of respondents rated the quality of documents they created using the service as excellent or very good.
- 80% rated their overall satisfaction with the site as excellent or very good and
- 90% would recommend the legal services website to family or friends.
We are grateful for the comments customers left as we can learn from the feedback and apply it to make improvements and to provide some educational commentary to help manage users’ expectations. It’s worth telling you more about some of the feedback we have received and I’m going to split my blog into two parts to avoid it being too long.
Users of the service who have connections to insurance were particularly positive about the site ARAG Legal Services - www.araglegal.co.uk.
For example:
For example:
“I registered as an insurance broker, as this is a free service for XXX policyholders I thought I ought to see what was in there. I must admit I was pleasantly surprised. H&S and risk assessment advice is most useful to my clients (Motor Trade). I felt a bit guilty using the log in code, so rang your customer service team to explain I wanted to have a look, and they encouraged me to do so. It has already helped me win one client. Thank you.”
Our response – We would encourage all our brokers to register and explore the site. You should have been given a voucher code but if you haven’t our Sales team can help. We can help with staff training if that’s needed too.
“I used to manage an insurance brokerage and we were frequently contacted by companies promoting inferior legal cover add on products who concentrated on profit over customer outcomes. We always remained selling ARAG's legal cover as knew the service was exemplary and cover broad. I have always renewed even after leaving that employment and now work in FCA Compliance.”
Our response – It’s great to have such complimentary feedback. Thank you. We want our products to work well for customers. We take a keen interest in the FCA’s work and have been involved in several consultations – notably the Market Study of Add-on products. We support the FCA’s remedies although the value measures will not work for LEI as they are partly based on good outcomes for consumers being evidenced by high loss ratios. The best outcomes for our customers occur when we win their claim and can recover the legal costs from the losing party. The measures also fail to take into account the additional value customers receive from using legal advice helplines and down loading legal documents.
That’s enough bragging – I mean, blogging for now. Look out for part 2 which is more of an “education piece”.
ARAG legal Services – What customers said
This is the second part of my ARAG Legal Services blog. We are grateful to customers who find time to leave feedback on their experience of using the website.
While I always hope for and never tire of hearing positive customer feedback, we also have some constructive comments that prompt a learning opportunity.
I would like to share a couple of these with you.
One customer wrote:
“I had a query about my policy but was told you did not have access to my schedule, this was problematic as I was passed back and forth between XXXXXX (business insurer) and yourselves and took 2 hours to find out the information I was looking for”.
“I had a query about my policy but was told you did not have access to my schedule, this was problematic as I was passed back and forth between XXXXXX (business insurer) and yourselves and took 2 hours to find out the information I was looking for”.
Our response - We’re sorry. This customer had LEI embedded
within a business insurance policy. While the business policy would have shown
insurer contact details for customer queries, we can understand how the
customer became confused. The technical team that look after the site content
and deal with IT related issues are not insurance professionals, so we need to
consider how best to direct individuals who raise with queries about their
insurance policy back to their insurer/ or to our Underwriting team if the
query relates to LEI. We will look at
messaging on the contacts page of the website and on our policy wordings to
help smooth out the customer journey and direct clients to the right person to
help.
“I received an e-mail saying my enquiry could not be dealt with by
them and to ring the legal advice line or submit a claim. As all part of the
same company, would have thought my enquiry might have been referred to the
appropriate quarter enabling them to contact me with a response. Also, legal
advice line number is very expensive and the alternative number provided in
the message was wrong. Why can you not use an 0800 number., Not impressed!”
Our response
- This customer raises a couple of points:
|
Finally,
I think this is a back-handed
compliment!
Not what I thought I was paying for although I do
like the idea of the free documentation you provide and would look for this
from any competitor when I move away from you.
Our response… stay with us!
Labels:
customer feedback,
Legal services
Location:
Bristol, UK
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



